AI Coding·Plans
DE

← Back to overview

Augment Code vs Zed (AI)

Augment Code (Augment) and Zed (AI) (Zed Industries) compared head-to-head: prices from $20 and $0, large codebase context vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Augment Code vs Zed (AI) — Category side-by-side

Provider Augment Code
Augment
Zed (AI)
Zed Industries
From /month $20 Free
Billing subscription + credits freemium + usage
Top models Augment proprietary, frontier models Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context large codebase context model-dependent
Limits credit-based usage since Oct 2025 Pro: $5 tokens included, then usage
Free tier limited trial free trial
Best for Large, complex codebases needing deep repo context Devs wanting a fast native editor with AI built in
Strengths
  • Huge codebase context
  • Strong enterprise story
  • Fast completions
  • Blazing-fast native editor
  • Inline AI edits
  • Token-based flexibility
Weaknesses
  • Credit-based costs can climb
  • Newer vendor
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Token usage adds up

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Zed (AI) ($0) is cheaper than Augment Code ($20).

Zed (AI) is especially strong when you care about "Devs wanting a fast native editor with AI built in".

🆫 Start without budget? Zed (AI) shines with a free tier (free trial).

Zed (AI) is especially strong when you care about "Devs wanting a fast native editor with AI built in".

Go to Augment Code → Go to Zed (AI) →

Frequently asked questions: Augment Code vs Zed (AI)

Augment Code or Zed (AI): which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Augment Code or Zed (AI)?

Augment Code reaches large codebase context, Zed (AI) reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Augment Code or Zed (AI)?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.