AI Coding·Plans
DE

← Back to overview

Claude Code vs Devin

Claude Code (Anthropic) and Devin (Cognition) compared head-to-head: prices from $20 and $20, 200K tokens vs. agentic sandbox context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Claude Code vs Devin — Category side-by-side

Provider Claude Code
Anthropic
Devin
Cognition
From /month $20 $20
Billing subscription + usage subscription + usage (ACU)
Top models Claude Opus 4, Claude Sonnet 4 Devin (Cognition)
Context 200K tokens agentic sandbox
Limits Pro: ~45 msgs/5h; Max: 5x–20x Pro usage ACU-based; ~$9/h of Devin time
Free tier limited free credits on console no — paid only
Best for Power-users wanting the strongest reasoning model in-terminal Offloading well-scoped engineering tasks to an autonomous agent
Strengths
  • Top-tier reasoning
  • Strong agentic tool use
  • First-class CLI
  • Truly autonomous end-to-end agent
  • Parallel tasks
  • PR-ready output
Weaknesses
  • Usage caps can hit fast on Pro
  • Premium pricing
  • Expensive at scale
  • Needs well-scoped tasks

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Claude Code ($20) is cheaper than Devin ($20).

Claude Code is especially strong when you care about "Power-users wanting the strongest reasoning model in-terminal".

🆫 Start without budget? Claude Code shines with a free tier (limited free credits on console).

Claude Code is especially strong when you care about "Power-users wanting the strongest reasoning model in-terminal".

Go to Claude Code → Go to Devin →

Frequently asked questions: Claude Code vs Devin

Claude Code or Devin: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Claude Code or Devin?

Claude Code reaches 200K tokens, Devin reaches agentic sandbox. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Claude Code or Devin?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.