AI Coding·Plans
DE

← Back to overview

Cline vs Bolt.new

Cline (open source (community)) and Bolt.new (StackBlitz) compared head-to-head: prices from $0 and $0, model-dependent vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Cline vs Bolt.new — Category side-by-side

Provider Cline
open source (community)
Bolt.new
StackBlitz
From /month Free Free
Billing BYO-key (usage) freemium + tokens
Top models Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Qwen3 Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context model-dependent model-dependent
Limits whatever your API key allows token-based; Pro: 10M tokens/mo
Free tier free software (model usage billed separately) yes — daily token allowance
Best for Devops who want a transparent, hackable agent Building & shipping fullstack apps from a prompt
Strengths
  • Fully open source
  • Works with any API provider
  • Transparent plans
  • Deploy-from-prompt
  • Zero-setup browser IDE
  • Fast prototyping
Weaknesses
  • You manage & pay for model usage
  • Less polish than commercial IDEs
  • Token costs on big apps
  • Less control than local dev

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Cline ($0) is cheaper than Bolt.new ($0).

Cline is especially strong when you care about "Devops who want a transparent, hackable agent".

Go to Cline → Go to Bolt.new →

Frequently asked questions: Cline vs Bolt.new

Cline or Bolt.new: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Cline or Bolt.new?

Cline reaches model-dependent, Bolt.new reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Cline or Bolt.new?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.