Cody vs Amazon Q Developer

Cody (Sourcegraph) and Amazon Q Developer (Amazon Web Services) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $0, large repo context vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Cody vs Amazon Q Developer — Category side-by-side

Provider	Cody Sourcegraph	Amazon Q Developer Amazon Web Services
From /month	$9	Free
Billing	subscription	freemium + subscription
Top models	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro	Amazon Q, Anthropic Claude
Context	large repo context	model-dependent
Limits	multi-model with repo-graph context	Free: monthly usage caps; Pro: higher limits
Free tier	limited free tier	yes — perpetual free tier
Best for	Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI	AWS shops wanting inline chat, agents & security scans
Strengths	Whole-codebase context via code graph Multi-model Enterprise search	Deep AWS integration Security scanning Generous free tier
Weaknesses	Best value is in big repos Editor experience varies	AWS-centric New signups sunset after May 15, 2026

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Amazon Q Developer ($0) is cheaper than Cody ($9).

Amazon Q Developer is especially strong when you care about "AWS shops wanting inline chat, agents & security scans".

Go to Cody → Go to Amazon Q Developer →

Frequently asked questions: Cody vs Amazon Q Developer

Cody or Amazon Q Developer: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Cody or Amazon Q Developer?

Cody reaches large repo context, Amazon Q Developer reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Cody or Amazon Q Developer?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.