Cody vs Augment Code

Cody (Sourcegraph) and Augment Code (Augment) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $20, large repo context vs. large codebase context context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Cody vs Augment Code — Category side-by-side

Provider	Cody Sourcegraph	Augment Code Augment
From /month	$9	$20
Billing	subscription	subscription + credits
Top models	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro	Augment proprietary, frontier models
Context	large repo context	large codebase context
Limits	multi-model with repo-graph context	credit-based usage since Oct 2025
Free tier	limited free tier	limited trial
Best for	Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI	Large, complex codebases needing deep repo context
Strengths	Whole-codebase context via code graph Multi-model Enterprise search	Huge codebase context Strong enterprise story Fast completions
Weaknesses	Best value is in big repos Editor experience varies	Credit-based costs can climb Newer vendor

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Cody ($9) is cheaper than Augment Code ($20).

Cody is especially strong when you care about "Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI".

🆫 Start without budget? Cody shines with a free tier (limited free tier).

Cody is especially strong when you care about "Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI".

Go to Cody → Go to Augment Code →

Frequently asked questions: Cody vs Augment Code

Cody or Augment Code: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Cody or Augment Code?

Cody reaches large repo context, Augment Code reaches large codebase context. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Cody or Augment Code?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.