Cody vs Bolt.new

Cody (Sourcegraph) and Bolt.new (StackBlitz) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $0, large repo context vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Cody vs Bolt.new — Category side-by-side

Provider	Cody Sourcegraph	Bolt.new StackBlitz
From /month	$9	Free
Billing	subscription	freemium + tokens
Top models	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context	large repo context	model-dependent
Limits	multi-model with repo-graph context	token-based; Pro: 10M tokens/mo
Free tier	limited free tier	yes — daily token allowance
Best for	Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI	Building & shipping fullstack apps from a prompt
Strengths	Whole-codebase context via code graph Multi-model Enterprise search	Deploy-from-prompt Zero-setup browser IDE Fast prototyping
Weaknesses	Best value is in big repos Editor experience varies	Token costs on big apps Less control than local dev

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Bolt.new ($0) is cheaper than Cody ($9).

Bolt.new is especially strong when you care about "Building & shipping fullstack apps from a prompt".

Go to Cody → Go to Bolt.new →

Frequently asked questions: Cody vs Bolt.new

Cody or Bolt.new: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Cody or Bolt.new?

Cody reaches large repo context, Bolt.new reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Cody or Bolt.new?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.