Cody vs Phind

Cody (Sourcegraph) and Phind (Phind) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $0, large repo context vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Cody vs Phind — Category side-by-side

Provider	Cody Sourcegraph	Phind Phind
From /month	$9	Free
Billing	subscription	freemium + subscription
Top models	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro	Phind, frontier models
Context	large repo context	model-dependent
Limits	multi-model with repo-graph context	Free: daily search cap
Free tier	limited free tier	yes — free tier
Best for	Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI	Developers researching answers & code online
Strengths	Whole-codebase context via code graph Multi-model Enterprise search	Great dev search Cited answers Strong free tier
Weaknesses	Best value is in big repos Editor experience varies	Search-focused, not a full IDE agent Credits can run out

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Phind ($0) is cheaper than Cody ($9).

Phind is especially strong when you care about "Developers researching answers & code online".

Go to Cody → Go to Phind →

Frequently asked questions: Cody vs Phind

Cody or Phind: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Cody or Phind?

Cody reaches large repo context, Phind reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Cody or Phind?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.