Cody vs Refact.ai

Cody (Sourcegraph) and Refact.ai (Refact) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $0, large repo context vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Cody vs Refact.ai — Category side-by-side

Provider	Cody Sourcegraph	Refact.ai Refact
From /month	$9	Free
Billing	subscription	freemium + credits
Top models	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro	Refact-1.6, frontier models
Context	large repo context	model-dependent
Limits	multi-model with repo-graph context	Free: daily agent cap; Pro: coin-based
Free tier	limited free tier	yes — personal free tier
Best for	Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI	Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs
Strengths	Whole-codebase context via code graph Multi-model Enterprise search	Open-weight, self-hostable models Autonomous agent Strong free tier
Weaknesses	Best value is in big repos Editor experience varies	Smaller ecosystem Coin accounting takes getting used to

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Refact.ai ($0) is cheaper than Cody ($9).

Refact.ai is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs".

Go to Cody → Go to Refact.ai →

Frequently asked questions: Cody vs Refact.ai

Cody or Refact.ai: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Cody or Refact.ai?

Cody reaches large repo context, Refact.ai reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Cody or Refact.ai?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.