Cody vs Warp

Cody (Sourcegraph) and Warp (Warp) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $0, large repo context vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Cody vs Warp — Category side-by-side

Provider	Cody Sourcegraph	Warp Warp
From /month	$9	Free
Billing	subscription	freemium + subscription
Top models	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro	GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context	large repo context	model-dependent
Limits	multi-model with repo-graph context	Free: no AI credits; Pro: ~1,500 credits/mo
Free tier	limited free tier	yes — core terminal free
Best for	Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI	Terminal-first devs wanting AI command help & agents
Strengths	Whole-codebase context via code graph Multi-model Enterprise search	AI-native terminal Frontier model access Workflow automation
Weaknesses	Best value is in big repos Editor experience varies	Recent price hikes Terminal-only focus

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Warp ($0) is cheaper than Cody ($9).

Warp is especially strong when you care about "Terminal-first devs wanting AI command help & agents".

Go to Cody → Go to Warp →

Frequently asked questions: Cody vs Warp

Cody or Warp: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Cody or Warp?

Cody reaches large repo context, Warp reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Cody or Warp?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.