Cursor vs Continue.dev
Cursor (Anysphere) and Continue.dev (Continue (open source)) compared head-to-head: prices from $20 and $0, model-dependent vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.
Cursor vs Continue.dev — Category side-by-side
| Provider | Cursor Anysphere | Continue.dev Continue (open source) |
|---|---|---|
| From /month | $20 | Free |
| Billing | subscription | BYO-key (usage) |
| Top models | Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro | Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Qwen3 |
| Context | model-dependent | model-dependent |
| Limits | Pro: 500 fast premium requests/mo | whatever your API key allows |
| Free tier | Hobby: 50 fast + slow requests/mo | free software (model usage billed separately) |
| Best for | Devs who want AI inside a familiar editor | Devs wanting a hackable, provider-agnostic copilot |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
Recommendation by priority
💰 On a budget? Continue.dev ($0) is cheaper than Cursor ($20).
Continue.dev is especially strong when you care about "Devs wanting a hackable, provider-agnostic copilot".
🆫 Start without budget? Continue.dev shines with a free tier (free software (model usage billed separately)).
Continue.dev is especially strong when you care about "Devs wanting a hackable, provider-agnostic copilot".
Frequently asked questions: Cursor vs Continue.dev
Cursor or Continue.dev: which is cheaper?
The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.
Which offers more context — Cursor or Continue.dev?
Cursor reaches model-dependent, Continue.dev reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.
Is there a free tier for Cursor or Continue.dev?
Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.