Gemini Code Assist vs Cody

Gemini Code Assist (Google) and Cody (Sourcegraph) compared head-to-head: prices from $0 and $9, 1M–2M tokens vs. large repo context context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Gemini Code Assist vs Cody — Category side-by-side

Provider	Gemini Code Assist Google	Cody Sourcegraph
From /month	Free	$9
Billing	freemium + subscription	subscription
Top models	Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Flash	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context	1M–2M tokens	large repo context
Limits	Free: 180 chat/agent + 6,000 completions/day	multi-model with repo-graph context
Free tier	yes — generous free individual tier	limited free tier
Best for	Long-context files and Google Cloud/Firebase users	Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI
Strengths	Huge context window Strong free tier GCP integration	Whole-codebase context via code graph Multi-model Enterprise search
Weaknesses	Best within Google ecosystem Agent maturity still catching up	Best value is in big repos Editor experience varies

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Gemini Code Assist ($0) is cheaper than Cody ($9).

Gemini Code Assist is especially strong when you care about "Long-context files and Google Cloud/Firebase users".

Go to Gemini Code Assist → Go to Cody →

Frequently asked questions: Gemini Code Assist vs Cody

Gemini Code Assist or Cody: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Gemini Code Assist or Cody?

Gemini Code Assist reaches 1M–2M tokens, Cody reaches large repo context. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Gemini Code Assist or Cody?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.