Refact.ai vs CodeGeeX

Refact.ai (Refact) and CodeGeeX (Z.ai (Zhipu) / Tsinghua) compared head-to-head: prices from $0 and $0, model-dependent vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Refact.ai vs CodeGeeX — Category side-by-side

Provider	Refact.ai Refact	CodeGeeX Z.ai (Zhipu) / Tsinghua
From /month	Free	Free
Billing	freemium + credits	freemium + subscription
Top models	Refact-1.6, frontier models	CodeGeeX-4, open weights
Context	model-dependent	model-dependent
Limits	Free: daily agent cap; Pro: coin-based	Free: limited credits; Pro: 500 credits
Free tier	yes — personal free tier	yes — generous free tier
Best for	Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs	Devs wanting a free, open-source multilingual copilot
Strengths	Open-weight, self-hostable models Autonomous agent Strong free tier	Open weights, self-hostable 100+ languages Strong free tier
Weaknesses	Smaller ecosystem Coin accounting takes getting used to	Behind frontier models on hard tasks Smaller community

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Refact.ai ($0) is cheaper than CodeGeeX ($0).

Refact.ai is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs".

Go to Refact.ai → Go to CodeGeeX →

Frequently asked questions: Refact.ai vs CodeGeeX

Refact.ai or CodeGeeX: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Refact.ai or CodeGeeX?

Refact.ai reaches model-dependent, CodeGeeX reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Refact.ai or CodeGeeX?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.