Refact.ai vs Sourcery

Refact.ai (Refact) and Sourcery (Sourcery / Sourcegraph) compared head-to-head: prices from $0 and $0, model-dependent vs. repo context context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Refact.ai vs Sourcery — Category side-by-side

Provider	Refact.ai Refact	Sourcery Sourcery / Sourcegraph
From /month	Free	Free
Billing	freemium + credits	freemium + subscription
Top models	Refact-1.6, frontier models	frontier models
Context	model-dependent	repo context
Limits	Free: daily agent cap; Pro: coin-based	Free: 20 issue investigations/mo
Free tier	yes — personal free tier	free for open-source repos
Best for	Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs	Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review
Strengths	Open-weight, self-hostable models Autonomous agent Strong free tier	Automated refactoring AI code review Strong Python support
Weaknesses	Smaller ecosystem Coin accounting takes getting used to	Narrow refactoring focus Now folded into Sourcegraph

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Refact.ai ($0) is cheaper than Sourcery ($0).

Refact.ai is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs".

Go to Refact.ai → Go to Sourcery →

Frequently asked questions: Refact.ai vs Sourcery

Refact.ai or Sourcery: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Refact.ai or Sourcery?

Refact.ai reaches model-dependent, Sourcery reaches repo context. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Refact.ai or Sourcery?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.