Roo Code vs Cody

Roo Code (open source (community)) and Cody (Sourcegraph) compared head-to-head: prices from $0 and $9, model-dependent vs. large repo context context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Roo Code vs Cody — Category side-by-side

Provider	Roo Code open source (community)	Cody Sourcegraph
From /month	Free	$9
Billing	BYO-key (usage)	subscription
Top models	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Qwen3	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context	model-dependent	large repo context
Limits	whatever your API key allows	multi-model with repo-graph context
Free tier	free software (model usage billed separately)	limited free tier
Best for	Power-users wanting custom modes & subagents	Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI
Strengths	Custom modes/subagents Open source Highly configurable	Whole-codebase context via code graph Multi-model Enterprise search
Weaknesses	You supply & pay for the model Steeper config	Best value is in big repos Editor experience varies

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Roo Code ($0) is cheaper than Cody ($9).

Roo Code is especially strong when you care about "Power-users wanting custom modes & subagents".

Go to Roo Code → Go to Cody →

Frequently asked questions: Roo Code vs Cody

Roo Code or Cody: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Roo Code or Cody?

Roo Code reaches model-dependent, Cody reaches large repo context. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Roo Code or Cody?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.