Sourcery vs Bolt.new

Sourcery (Sourcery / Sourcegraph) and Bolt.new (StackBlitz) compared head-to-head: prices from $0 and $0, repo context vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Sourcery vs Bolt.new — Category side-by-side

Provider	Sourcery Sourcery / Sourcegraph	Bolt.new StackBlitz
From /month	Free	Free
Billing	freemium + subscription	freemium + tokens
Top models	frontier models	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context	repo context	model-dependent
Limits	Free: 20 issue investigations/mo	token-based; Pro: 10M tokens/mo
Free tier	free for open-source repos	yes — daily token allowance
Best for	Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review	Building & shipping fullstack apps from a prompt
Strengths	Automated refactoring AI code review Strong Python support	Deploy-from-prompt Zero-setup browser IDE Fast prototyping
Weaknesses	Narrow refactoring focus Now folded into Sourcegraph	Token costs on big apps Less control than local dev

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Sourcery ($0) is cheaper than Bolt.new ($0).

Sourcery is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review".

Go to Sourcery → Go to Bolt.new →

Frequently asked questions: Sourcery vs Bolt.new

Sourcery or Bolt.new: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Sourcery or Bolt.new?

Sourcery reaches repo context, Bolt.new reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Sourcery or Bolt.new?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.