Sourcery vs Devin

Sourcery (Sourcery / Sourcegraph) and Devin (Cognition) compared head-to-head: prices from $0 and $20, repo context vs. agentic sandbox context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Sourcery vs Devin — Category side-by-side

Provider	Sourcery Sourcery / Sourcegraph	Devin Cognition
From /month	Free	$20
Billing	freemium + subscription	subscription + usage (ACU)
Top models	frontier models	Devin (Cognition)
Context	repo context	agentic sandbox
Limits	Free: 20 issue investigations/mo	ACU-based; ~$9/h of Devin time
Free tier	free for open-source repos	no — paid only
Best for	Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review	Offloading well-scoped engineering tasks to an autonomous agent
Strengths	Automated refactoring AI code review Strong Python support	Truly autonomous end-to-end agent Parallel tasks PR-ready output
Weaknesses	Narrow refactoring focus Now folded into Sourcegraph	Expensive at scale Needs well-scoped tasks

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Sourcery ($0) is cheaper than Devin ($20).

Sourcery is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review".

🆫 Start without budget? Sourcery shines with a free tier (free for open-source repos).

Sourcery is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review".

Go to Sourcery → Go to Devin →

Frequently asked questions: Sourcery vs Devin

Sourcery or Devin: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Sourcery or Devin?

Sourcery reaches repo context, Devin reaches agentic sandbox. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Sourcery or Devin?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.