AI Coding·Plans
DE

← Back to overview

Sourcery vs OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin)

Sourcery (Sourcery / Sourcegraph) and OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin) (All Hands AI (open source)) compared head-to-head: prices from $0 and $0, repo context vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Sourcery vs OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin) — Category side-by-side

Provider Sourcery
Sourcery / Sourcegraph
OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin)
All Hands AI (open source)
From /month Free Free
Billing freemium + subscription BYO-key (usage)
Top models frontier models Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, open models
Context repo context model-dependent
Limits Free: 20 issue investigations/mo whatever your API key allows
Free tier free for open-source repos free software (model usage billed separately)
Best for Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review Devs wanting a transparent autonomous agent they control
Strengths
  • Automated refactoring
  • AI code review
  • Strong Python support
  • Fully open source
  • Autonomous multi-tool agent
  • Self-hostable
Weaknesses
  • Narrow refactoring focus
  • Now folded into Sourcegraph
  • You supply & pay for the model
  • Setup required

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Sourcery ($0) is cheaper than OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin) ($0).

Sourcery is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review".

Go to Sourcery → Go to OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin) →

Frequently asked questions: Sourcery vs OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin)

Sourcery or OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin): which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Sourcery or OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin)?

Sourcery reaches repo context, OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin) reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Sourcery or OpenHands (ex-OpenDevin)?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.