Sourcery vs Phind

Sourcery (Sourcery / Sourcegraph) and Phind (Phind) compared head-to-head: prices from $0 and $0, repo context vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Sourcery vs Phind — Category side-by-side

Provider	Sourcery Sourcery / Sourcegraph	Phind Phind
From /month	Free	Free
Billing	freemium + subscription	freemium + subscription
Top models	frontier models	Phind, frontier models
Context	repo context	model-dependent
Limits	Free: 20 issue investigations/mo	Free: daily search cap
Free tier	free for open-source repos	yes — free tier
Best for	Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review	Developers researching answers & code online
Strengths	Automated refactoring AI code review Strong Python support	Great dev search Cited answers Strong free tier
Weaknesses	Narrow refactoring focus Now folded into Sourcegraph	Search-focused, not a full IDE agent Credits can run out

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Sourcery ($0) is cheaper than Phind ($0).

Sourcery is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review".

Go to Sourcery → Go to Phind →

Frequently asked questions: Sourcery vs Phind

Sourcery or Phind: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Sourcery or Phind?

Sourcery reaches repo context, Phind reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Sourcery or Phind?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.