Tabnine vs Cody

Tabnine (Tabnine (Braintrust)) and Cody (Sourcegraph) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $9, n/a vs. large repo context context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Tabnine vs Cody — Category side-by-side

Provider	Tabnine Tabnine (Braintrust)	Cody Sourcegraph
From /month	$9	$9
Billing	subscription	subscription
Top models	Tabnine proprietary, on-prem models	Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context	n/a	large repo context
Limits	per-seat	multi-model with repo-graph context
Free tier	basic free tier	limited free tier
Best for	Enterprises with strict data/IP requirements	Large, multi-repo codebases needing code search + AI
Strengths	Strong privacy/SOC2 story Self-hosted option Enterprise focus	Whole-codebase context via code graph Multi-model Enterprise search
Weaknesses	Weaker than frontier models on agentic tasks Smaller community	Best value is in big repos Editor experience varies

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Tabnine ($9) is cheaper than Cody ($9).

Tabnine is especially strong when you care about "Enterprises with strict data/IP requirements".

Go to Tabnine → Go to Cody →

Frequently asked questions: Tabnine vs Cody

Tabnine or Cody: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Tabnine or Cody?

Tabnine reaches n/a, Cody reaches large repo context. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Tabnine or Cody?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.