Tabnine vs Refact.ai
Tabnine (Tabnine (Braintrust)) and Refact.ai (Refact) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $0, n/a vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.
Tabnine vs Refact.ai — Category side-by-side
| Provider | Tabnine Tabnine (Braintrust) | Refact.ai Refact |
|---|---|---|
| From /month | $9 | Free |
| Billing | subscription | freemium + credits |
| Top models | Tabnine proprietary, on-prem models | Refact-1.6, frontier models |
| Context | n/a | model-dependent |
| Limits | per-seat | Free: daily agent cap; Pro: coin-based |
| Free tier | basic free tier | yes — personal free tier |
| Best for | Enterprises with strict data/IP requirements | Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
Recommendation by priority
💰 On a budget? Refact.ai ($0) is cheaper than Tabnine ($9).
Refact.ai is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs".
Frequently asked questions: Tabnine vs Refact.ai
Tabnine or Refact.ai: which is cheaper?
The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.
Which offers more context — Tabnine or Refact.ai?
Tabnine reaches n/a, Refact.ai reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.
Is there a free tier for Tabnine or Refact.ai?
Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.