AI Coding·Plans
DE

← Back to overview

Tabnine vs Refact.ai

Tabnine (Tabnine (Braintrust)) and Refact.ai (Refact) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $0, n/a vs. model-dependent context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Tabnine vs Refact.ai — Category side-by-side

Provider Tabnine
Tabnine (Braintrust)
Refact.ai
Refact
From /month $9 Free
Billing subscription freemium + credits
Top models Tabnine proprietary, on-prem models Refact-1.6, frontier models
Context n/a model-dependent
Limits per-seat Free: daily agent cap; Pro: coin-based
Free tier basic free tier yes — personal free tier
Best for Enterprises with strict data/IP requirements Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs
Strengths
  • Strong privacy/SOC2 story
  • Self-hosted option
  • Enterprise focus
  • Open-weight, self-hostable models
  • Autonomous agent
  • Strong free tier
Weaknesses
  • Weaker than frontier models on agentic tasks
  • Smaller community
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Coin accounting takes getting used to

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Refact.ai ($0) is cheaper than Tabnine ($9).

Refact.ai is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting self-hostable open-weight coding LLMs".

Go to Tabnine → Go to Refact.ai →

Frequently asked questions: Tabnine vs Refact.ai

Tabnine or Refact.ai: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Tabnine or Refact.ai?

Tabnine reaches n/a, Refact.ai reaches model-dependent. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Tabnine or Refact.ai?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.