Tabnine vs Sourcery

Tabnine (Tabnine (Braintrust)) and Sourcery (Sourcery / Sourcegraph) compared head-to-head: prices from $9 and $0, n/a vs. repo context context, free tiers, models, limits plus strengths and weaknesses. Find out which AI coding agent fits your workflow.

Tabnine vs Sourcery — Category side-by-side

Provider	Tabnine Tabnine (Braintrust)	Sourcery Sourcery / Sourcegraph
From /month	$9	Free
Billing	subscription	freemium + subscription
Top models	Tabnine proprietary, on-prem models	frontier models
Context	n/a	repo context
Limits	per-seat	Free: 20 issue investigations/mo
Free tier	basic free tier	free for open-source repos
Best for	Enterprises with strict data/IP requirements	Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review
Strengths	Strong privacy/SOC2 story Self-hosted option Enterprise focus	Automated refactoring AI code review Strong Python support
Weaknesses	Weaker than frontier models on agentic tasks Smaller community	Narrow refactoring focus Now folded into Sourcegraph

Recommendation by priority

💰 On a budget? Sourcery ($0) is cheaper than Tabnine ($9).

Sourcery is especially strong when you care about "Teams wanting automated refactoring & code review".

Go to Tabnine → Go to Sourcery →

Frequently asked questions: Tabnine vs Sourcery

Tabnine or Sourcery: which is cheaper?

The entry price depends on each provider and plan tier. This page shows the current indicative values side by side.

Which offers more context — Tabnine or Sourcery?

Tabnine reaches n/a, Sourcery reaches repo context. More context helps with long files and large repos.

Is there a free tier for Tabnine or Sourcery?

Yes — details on free tiers and free quotas are in the side-by-side table above.